Security Program Assessment
& Development
Independent Physical Security Program Development.
Having security measures is not the same as having a security program.
A security program assessment evaluates how those measures operate together and defines the structure required to manage risk consistently across the organization.
WHY ORGANIZATIONS TRUST BPS
- 36 years in business
- 150+ years of combined expertise
- Independent and product neutral
- 96% Net Promoter Score
Thank you for your message
We’ll be in touch within 48 hours.
In the meantime, here’s a quick look at our approach.
Do I Need a Security Program Assessment?
Organizations typically need a Security Program Assessment for one of two reasons.
Our assessments are grounded in globally recognized standards, including ISO 31000 (Risk management – guidelines), ISO 22301 (business continuity), and NIST frameworks.
ACTIVITY WITHOUT STRUCTURE
Security activity has grown without a coherent framework behind it. Controls have been added over time, responsibility is distributed across multiple teams, and there’s no shared view of how it all fits together.
CHANGE OVER TIME
Sites have been acquired or consolidated. Operations have expanded. Exposure to theft, sabotage, workplace violence, or operational loss has increased. Leadership, regulators, or insurers are asking questions that the current setup wasn’t designed to answer.
COMMON TRIGGERS FOR A SECURITY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT
- Controls exist, but aren’t governed as a program
- Responsibility for security is distributed across functions
- Growth or change has outpaced the current structure
- Leadership needs a clearer view of exposure
- Compliance or liability expectations are increasing
- Decisions are being made reactively
In both situations, the challenge is the same: having controls in place is not the same as having a program.
A security program assessment clarifies what exists, what’s missing, and what structure is needed to manage risk consistently.
What Questions Does a Physical Security Risk Assessment Answer?
A security program assessment is designed to answer two questions every organization should be able to answer about its own security:
- ARE WE DOING THE RIGHT THINGS?
Are the controls in place aligned to the risks the organization actually faces? - ARE WE DOING THEM THE RIGHT WAY?
Are those controls structured, owned, and operating in a way that delivers the outcomes we expect? - LIKELY PERFORMANCE
Are those controls likely to perform as intended and deliver good outcomes?
These questions go beyond whether security activity is happening at all.
They focus on whether that activity is structured, owned, and likely to perform consistently over time. A program assessment is what turns a collection of measures into something defensible, scalable, and integrated with how the business operates.
How Does Your Program Align with Enterprise Governance & Compliance?
C-suite and board-level leaders need clear answers to governance questions that regulators, insurers, and stakeholders increasingly demand.
What Does a Security Program Assessment Involve?
Our engagements are evidence-based and grounded in how the organization actually operates.
THE COMPONENTS OF SECURITY RISK
This framework underpins every program we assess and develop.
- Threats
Credible scenarios that could impact people, assets, or operations - Consequences
The potential harm, disruption, or loss if those scenarios occur - Vulnerabilities
Weaknesses in people, process, or technology that could be exploited - Governance & Accountability
Ownership, decision rights, documentation, and oversight that make the program defensible and scalable
A security program ensures these components are managed consistently, not addressed in isolation.
The Assessment & Development Process
Our process is designed to be thorough without being disruptive.
- Discovery
Understanding how your facility operates and what matters most. - Program assessment
Evaluating controls, governance, and ownership against risk. - Framework development
Defining standards, roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes. - Prioritized roadmap
Phased actions sequenced by risk, operational impact, and available resources. - Implementation guidance
Support in sequencing rollout, decision points, and review milestones.
Engagement length depends on scope and complexity.
Work can be phased to align with operational and budget constraints.
What Expertise Will BPS Provide?
A security program assessment is designed to support decision-making, not overwhelm it.
You receive:
- A structured assessment of current program maturity, tailored to the organization’s size, sites, and industry.
- A defined governance framework with roles, responsibilities, and decision rights for enterprise risk management.
- Standards for consistent application across sites and teams, designed to scale as operations grow.
- Standards for consistent application across sites and teams, designed to scale as operations grow.
- A prioritized roadmap, sequenced by risk and operational impact.
- Documented reasoning to support compliance with OSHA General Duty Clause, premises liability, duty of care obligations, and regulatory requirements
- Alignment of physical security with broader ERM and ESG reporting requirements.
- Training guidance for personnel managing security alongside other roles, supporting a culture of shared responsibility.
- An executive summary to support leadership discussion and planning.
Around 80% of our recommendations do not require capital investment. Most improvements come from structure, governance, and better use of existing resources.
The emphasis is on clarity, relevance, and usability.
What Happens When a Security Program Is Properly Structured
Organizations that move from ad hoc controls to a structured program see specific, observable changes.
- Decisions become defensible in audits, insurance reviews, and board-level discussions because they are tied to recognized standards (ISO, NIST) and documented risk reasoning.
- Ownership is named at every level. Responsibilities are defined across security, facilities, EHS, operations, and leadership, with decision rights clear at each level.
- Standards apply consistently. Sites, teams, and functions operate to the same expectations, rather than each interpreting controls locally.
- Existing systems start delivering value. Most security technology operates below its capability. A structured program brings configuration, testing, and use back to a reasonable standard.
- Reactive spending declines. When the framework holds, fewer decisions get made under pressure, and fewer measures need to be retrofitted after an incident.
- These outcomes reflect what changes when a program is built on real conditions, rather than layered on top of them.
Why Organizations Choose BPS
Independent
We don’t sell products or services. Our recommendations are based solely on risk.
Experienced
Decades of experience across complex, multi-site, and high-risk environments.
Evidence-led
Clear methodology grounded in recognized standards and proven security principles.
Outcome-focused
Advice designed to deliver practical, defensible results.
FAQs
Common questions about scope, disruption, and confidentiality.
next step.
Contact Us
The best time to evaluate your security program is before you need to.
Let’s start that conversation.
